Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Timo Stodder vs Jiri Barnat Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Stodder vs Barnat analysis and find out who is favored!
Timo Stodder vs Jiri Barnat Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Stodder 1 - 0 Barnat
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Stodder has won 46.18% of points on their second serve, while Barnat has won 52.8%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Stodder, in recent form, has won 51.61% of their opponent's second serve points, while Barnat has won 50%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.71% and 36.73% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Stodder has saved 52.75% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Barnat has saved 42.86% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Stodder has won 54.24% of matches played (W/L 32/ 27), with Barnat winning 53.06% (W/L 26/ 23) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Stodder has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 68% (W/L 21/ 10), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 56% (W/L 14/ 11). Barnat has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 26/ 17), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 55% (W/L 18/ 15).
- Player level: In the last year, Stodder has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 18/ 18), where as Barnat has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 55.32% of matches (W/L 26/ 21). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Stodder winning 1 times and Barnat being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Stodder winning 2 and Barnat winning 0. The last match between Stodder and Barnat was at the M25 Jablonec nad Nisou, 01-09-2023, Quarterfinals, Clay with Timo Stodder getting the victory 7-6(2) 6-0.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:14:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Stodder and Barnat have played a deciding set 0 times, with Stodder winning 0 times and Barnat 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Stodder winning 1, and Barnat 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Stodder has played against opponents with an average rank of 221.03 while Barnat has played against players with an average rank of 217.45.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Stodder has won 53% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Barnat has won 47% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Stodder has converted 52.54% of breakpoint opportunities, and Barnat has converted 52.27% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
325
Rank
257
High
28
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
762
Rank
578
High
22
Age
Plays
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
Form
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
65% (196-106)
Career Total W/L
57% (114-87)
36% (4-7)
YTD W/L
50% (6-6)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Timo Stodder | Jiri Barnat |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 5 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:14:0 | 1:14:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (36/62) | 52% (32/61) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 81% (29/36) | 63% (20/32) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 54% (14/26) | 41% (12/29) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 57% (4/7) | 13% (1/8) |
| Return Points W% | 48% (29/61) | 31% (19/62) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(2) 6-0 |
Stats 
Timo Stodder
Player
Jiri Barnat
58%
(
36 of
62)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
61)
3
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
5
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
31%
(
19 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
72
Total Points Won
51
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Timo Stodder | Jiri Barnat |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 36% (4/7) | 50% (6/6) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 36% (9/16) | 52% (15/14) |
| Games Win/Loss | 45% (109/135) | 52% (137/126) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 44% (4/5) | 50% (6/6) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.29 | 0.18 |
| Aces Total | 34 | 23 |
| DFs per game | 0.25 | 0.29 |
| DFs Total | 30 | 37 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:38:46 | 1:39:10 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 81.18 | 173.42 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (490/791) | 58% (473/812) |
| 1st Serve W% | 61% (300/490) | 63% (298/473) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (139/301) | 53% (179/339) |
| BPs Won% Total | 53% (31/59) | 52% (46/88) |
| Return Pts W% | 39% (310/792) | 42% (355/840) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 29% (2/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 67% (2/1) | 50% (6/6) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 40% (4/10) | 50% (6/12) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (3/6) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 100% (2/2) | 40% (2/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 75% (4/3) | 71% (7/5) |
| 1st set W, L | 25% (4/1) | 29% (7/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 14% (7/1) | 20% (5/1) |
Timo Stodder Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Luka Pavlovic
Player
Timo Stodder
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
76)
11
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
85%
(
39 of
46)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
33 of
49)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
22 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
76)
87
Total Points Won
65
|
6-7(2) 6-1 5-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Timo Stodder
Player
Denis Petak
75%
(
67 of
89)
1st Serve %
60%
(
65 of
108)
1
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
14
51%
(
34 of
67)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
44 of
65)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
15 of
43)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
47%
(
42 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
49 of
108)
96
Total Points Won
101
|
1-6 6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Timo Stodder
Player
Marko Maksimovic
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve %
51%
(
32 of
63)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
34 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tibo Colson
Player
Timo Stodder
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve %
57%
(
36 of
63)
14
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
21%
(
12 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
63)
70
Total Points Won
50
|
7-6(0) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Steve Johnson
Player
Timo Stodder
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve %
54%
(
32 of
59)
8
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
89%
(
25 of
28)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
10 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
59)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kilian Feldbausch
Player
Timo Stodder
63%
(
45 of
71)
1st Serve %
54%
(
36 of
67)
2
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
1
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
42%
(
30 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
77
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Timo Stodder
Player
Juan Pablo Ficovich
49%
(
63 of
129)
1st Serve %
48%
(
48 of
101)
10
Aces
6
11
Double Faults
4
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
44%
(
29 of
66)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
43%
(
56 of
129)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
101)
116
Total Points Won
114
|
7-5 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gerard Campana Lee
Player
Timo Stodder
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve %
69%
(
46 of
67)
2
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
73
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Facundo Bagnis
Player
Timo Stodder
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
6
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
41%
(
22 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dmitry Popko
Player
Timo Stodder
43%
(
32 of
74)
1st Serve %
58%
(
44 of
76)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
48%
(
20 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
28 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
35 of
76)
81
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(7) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Jiri Barnat Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Blaz Rola
Player
Jiri Barnat
58%
(
45 of
78)
1st Serve %
61%
(
49 of
80)
8
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
6
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
64%
(
21 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
25 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
80)
91
Total Points Won
67
|
4-6 6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jiri Barnat
Player
Thomas Deschamps
56%
(
49 of
87)
1st Serve %
56%
(
45 of
81)
4
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
2
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
55%
(
21 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
32 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
81)
90
Total Points Won
78
|
6-3 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jiri Barnat
Player
Jan Kupcic
53%
(
27 of
51)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
67%
(
18 of
27)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
21 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nico Hipfl
Player
Jiri Barnat
60%
(
57 of
95)
1st Serve %
57%
(
48 of
84)
2
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
3
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
37 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
34 of
84)
92
Total Points Won
87
|
6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Stijn Slump
Player
Jiri Barnat
35%
(
19 of
55)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
79%
(
15 of
19)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
72%
(
26 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
14 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
22 of
63)
63
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jiri Barnat
Player
Martins Rocens
51%
(
45 of
88)
1st Serve %
61%
(
56 of
92)
2
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
5
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
38 of
56)
51%
(
22 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
44%
(
39 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
40 of
92)
89
Total Points Won
91
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Aleksandre Metreveli
Player
Jiri Barnat
71%
(
62 of
87)
1st Serve %
59%
(
60 of
102)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
35 of
60)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
27 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
43 of
102)
103
Total Points Won
86
|
6-7(3) 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jiri Barnat
Player
Andrey Chepelev
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
38%
(
19 of
50)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
11
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
16 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
35
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Giuseppe La Vela
Player
Jiri Barnat
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
41%
(
26 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
Player
Jiri Barnat
54%
(
45 of
83)
1st Serve %
51%
(
36 of
70)
0
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
1
58%
(
26 of
45)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
61%
(
23 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
41%
(
34 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
70)
83
Total Points Won
70
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stodder Vs Barnat Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
